Pewdiepie Complains against Nintendo Youtube Policy

[DonFerrari]

fps_d0minat0r said:

DonFerrari said:

So now car market is closer to videogame than movies??? That is certainly new for me.

You don't buy a license to use the car, you buy the car. But even so if you use a brand of cars to promote yourself you'll have to pay if the brand onwer demands it. Any movie that have a car on it if they desire to show the name, or brand of it.

Well let's see how good they can do without the games and just their comments on any other subject, shall we?

Thats because if you fail at reading, you will fail at understanding.

I wasnt comparing the markets, I was comparing the nature in which the products are used by the end consumer. There is a greater purpose to a car and video games then watching/listening to the end consumer but for music/movies, theres is not... because thats ALL there is.

As I mentioned, its not possible to commentate over music, but for movies, plenty of youtubers are showing the best clips from movies and commentating over it. They are not paying anything to the publishers of those movies, since the content overall is unique.

You cant go around acting smart when you dont even understand the basics of copyright and cant even identify what counts as fair use.

You said it all... clips, not the entire thing... please entertain me on the basics of copyright and fair use on presenting 100% of someones property and just having your comments over it.

And also please show how driving the car around is similar to end user as playing VGs, and also why automakers will get money (or pay for advertsment depending on the case) when any tv production shows their car with name or brand/logo if it only show a glimpse of the car...