By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Shinobi-san said:
DonFerrari said:

2. That is exactly the reason why Nintendo and others should do it... have you ever saw any songmaker or record company trying to pass law or hunt down people who sing and perform on street??? Nope... but if you use someones song in a venue then you have to pay... so if you are using the share function a console offer to exchange experience with your friends none will care, but if you are making good money out of it them you should pay..

Are we all comunists in here to think Nintendo and the other companies aren't allowed the money generated by their IPs?


Thats the grey area though, because the money generated is not solely generated because of their content. Anyone can put up a lets play video, but not anyone can do it and make money off of it.

Ultimately thats what we debating here.

And it isn't generated solely because of the guy talking as he needs the content. So he have to pay a share because of the content. Even the guy complaining says Nintendo is in their right so I don't know why this part would be the discussion.

 

I don't think anyone here have someone making profits based on his hardwork to be able to complain.

 

If I used that guy video and audio and Just re-recorded with my face would I be in the right to collect 100% of the profit I made? I am artistically making faces while using his dub and ninty raw material.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."