S.T.A.G.E. said:
Goatseye said:
Why would you argue? Most likely the development cost are kept low, no contract with dead weight teams and different methods of work are used to distinguish IPs from inhouse's.
|
They even admitted that the risks are too high making first party exclusives they were questioned by the media as to why they werent having as much exclusive output as Sony. MS has no style. They aren't known for anything outside of simulators that sets them apart developmentwise from the competition. The only things they have are games that they've purchased. The games they actually created like Fable and Crackdown are all midtier at best. They admitted again that theyve tried to make games to go up against Uncharted and have yet to come up with anything themselves that ever could, which is why they moneyhatted Tomb Raider.
|
You surely like to put spin on stuff.
Phil Spencer only said that they don't have a 3rd person adventure game "a la" Indiana Jones to go against Uncharted and Tomb Raider.
Nintendo is the only of the big 3, that has a distinctive style. Sony has no style and never had.
Third party was what put PS1 and PS2 on top of their respective gens. What games did Sony creat that set trend in the industry?