By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
Shinobi-san said:
It should'nt even be legal for Nintendo or any other publisher to claim profits from lets plays. The gamer has already purchased the game and the publisher has already received the money for the game sale.


Why shouldn't be legal for the IP owner to retain control from it's IP??? He bought a license to play no to profit on it.


Nintendo still has full control over their IP. A game is not like a movie or a song...the primary enjoyment received from a game is through playing it not watching it. So i dont see how this infringes on their IP.

Something key to note here is that people dont simply watch any random lets play video, the game and the IP is pretty much irrelevant in most cases, moreso in pewdiepie's case. These guys are famous for their personalities, humour, commentary etc.

Other youtubers are popular because of speed runs, being the best, world records etc. Others are popuular because they aim to teach others how to play games, through tutorials and how to vids.

So yeah im struggling to see why a gaming publisher would feel entitled to the ad revenue of a video of a gamer playing their game, which they have already purchased, for reasons other than greed.

If this was a matter of principle and IP protection they would have reacted a long time ago, its only because some of these youtubers have gotten really popular that they now want a piece of the pie.

This goes for all game publishers trying to do this not just Nintendo. Clamping down on movies and music however, makes complete sense from a publisher point of view but not games.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|