| theprof00 said: Jclock youtube is the network and they already take that profit. Should a garden owner take profits from a youtube video i made wherein i enjoyed the garden? Ghost hunter shows used hotels and inns for a majority of their content. these places LOVED when they would come by and "lets play" them. They have drummers up so much interest for these types of places. Should these places get a share of advertising revenue? |
Uh no,
Youtube is a platform, and not a network.
Maker, Polaris, Nintendo Creators Program, Machinama, etc are all networks.
You do NOT own the content you are sharing if it's video games or movies. You own a licenses to view/play it. Your example is complete bullshit and just dumb. You are dealing with content owners not garden variety garden lovers.
Ghost Hunters has a ton of legal paperwork that they have to go through in order to use those places. Usually these places get a ton of publicity for those things. Therefore, creates income
I really don't understand the rest of what you said. But if you are sharing someone elses copyrighted work without expressed permission from that person, then they deserve the ad revenue and you do not. If the copyright holder has given you a set guideline for using their content then you will not break that
Under fair use, reviews, commentaries and covers are allowed and Nintendo cant do crap all about them.
