DigitalDevilSummoner said:
You managed to find an extremely obscure article on the matter, you made one sided remarks taking Pewd's position out of contenxt, you refuse to aknowledge the gamasutra article which calls your biased bs. You are doing this forum a disservice.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5cEU51PbTw
|
Managed to find? Nope, it was on the front page of this site.
How can it be one sided if his own point is in the link provided in the opening?
I refuse to aknowledge? Nope, I just said it isn't cientific study to be used to prove this and other guys do more good to Nintendo then they are doing themselves. And you are doing even less by the forum by being unecessarily unpolite towards others.
And about your answer to PwerlvlArmy, please respect other people point of view and say the person is talking nonsense after complaing I shoot down your point.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."