IFireflyl said:
GribbleGrunger said:
IFireflyl said:
I am not wrong. If you can prove to me how I am wrong I will concede. I have given you examples of definitions/games that show that I have a valid point. You have said that I am wrong because you want me to be wrong. The one example you gave (Devil May Cry) has a battle system that is almost exactly like Bloodborne, yet somehow Devil May Cry is a hack-and-slash game, but Bloodborne is not? Your logic doesn't add up, and I will not admit that I am wrong to "faulty" logic.
|
You are the only person I've ever come across in ALL the threads on ALL the forums that thinks this is a hack and slash. We're discussing this RPG elsewhere at this very moment. And here's a little something for you:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodborne
You clearly couldn't move along.
|
You just wanted to tell me I'm wrong because you think I'm wrong. You have given me no proof of anything.
Edit: And you still haven't explained how this gameplay is different from Devil May Cry which you cited as a hack-and-slash game. How is this gameplay different? Please tell me?
|
We don't need proof, we played the souls games, u obviously have not. Dlc is fast paced hack and slash. This is tactical, slower, requires stamina to do everything. Two sword swings and your stamina is drained thus you need to retreat and regroup. Maybe play games before saying misinformation
The combat us weighty, realistic tactical, nothing like a hack and slash game. Play it like one and prepared to get destroyed.
