SWORDF1SH said:
On yor say so?!? People that keep saying that they didn't need one. Please explain why because you're not really adding to the discussion. If Sony had spare units, then why is it ok to loose 600k of their lead, allow your competitor get a foot hold and now a have almost just as many units in the biggest single market, the US. Yes they outsold the X1 worldwide but why does that mean they can allow their competition gain ground in some markets? Why would a company allow the competitor take market share? Permanent price cut? no. But they needed to stop the X1 taking so much market share. Hell even a $20 holiday price cut would of shifted a lot more. Or a bundle that lasted the whole holiday. $380 TLOU bundle anybody. Even a $400 TLOU/inFamous bundle for the whole holiday would of done something. It's also a first party games that wouldn't cost them anything to bundle. Instead of just throwing out the argument and saying /thread, add something, explain why you think they didn't need to, have a debate, stay a while. Forums should be a place to respectfully point your point across. |
why becasue they still sold over 18.5 millions PS4, thats why.
