fireburn95 said:
Microsoft didn't sign an advertising deal, so they can claim all the money, since they could legally say "This video made ad money because people watched it for the game we published" Would PewDiePie get 2 million a year if every video was purely his dramatic reactions? No, no one would watch that, so it's both the reactions, and moreso, the game, that people tune into. And even morals, ethics and code aside, at the end of the day, a game has the same legal rights as a movie. Microsoft have chosen to pursue those legal rights, and hell, smart of them, no one is gonna not upload halo 5 gameplay because microsoft are taking a percentage. |
you know that legally you are right. Some publishers are smart enough to let it happen though because they know the benefits. EA and Activision prime examples. Ubisoft maybe too. Sony are all for it and I've personally dealt with people from SOny looking to get YouTubers to play Planetside 2 for them when it was in beta. EA paid all the COD guys to come and play Battlefield 4.
End of the day they have every right to claim these vids or remove them but they will only hurt themselves.
EDIT:
The end game is nobody makes vids about "insert game". Game loses a lot of hype and publicity. Other games prosper. Money from claimed videos dwindles due to lack of new uploads from popular youtubers. Game sells less.







