padib said:
Try to read what I'm saying. I understood your idea, you've said it before. What I'm saying is different. If ideas are spoken out in public, these demagogues that Lafiel highlighted would have less reason to exist, their ideas being exposed for the analysis of everyone. Please try to address what I'm saying, not what you want to say to any post I write, if that's not too much to ask. |
You started this thread, but this is the internet, and this thread doesn't belong to you. You can't dictate how I respond to you. I will respond how I like.
There has to be restriction on what can be said/done. There's always going to be someone touting the "Freedom of Speech" line. I hear what you're saying. You're not saying anything different. I'm just saying that there are going to be restrictions, and it is difficult to tell where the line is in a lot of cases. Everything can't be aired out in public. That causes chaos, confusion, panic, etc.
