Panther111 on 23 January 2015
Well. Freedom of speech is complicated.
When that freedom of speech entails the intention to hinder and restrict the freedom of others.
Freedom of religion is also complicated. As the manifestoes of many religions promptly encourages certain groups of people to be denied their freedom, and also certain aspects of holy books that directly opposes the law and the human rights that have been established in the 21st century.
So should there be freedom of religion when aspects of that religion opposes the law ans tramples on individual rights of people and groups?
Important to remember that religion, and the books associated with the religious practice, are in strict opposition to the law and human rights, and thus illegal.
