By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Wyrdness said:
DonFerrari said:


Let's just pretend Nintendo have nothing to do with it so no criticism can be made... Sure.


Not pretending kid look it up yourself, The Pokemon Company handle everything look them up if you wish they're a company created solely for managing that brand, the games, animes, cards and movies, internally Nintendo has little to do with Pokemon's activities.


And you truly believe just because Nintendo created a company to manage the brand they get no say or it stops being them but represented? I'll be damned if Nintendo wouldn't intervene if they weren't satisfied, it's one of their golden IP.

 

In Brazil Maurício de Souza company have iron clam in any licensed products with Turma da Mônica on it and determines all the quality Standards and contract. I doubt Nintendo don't have the same control over it. Seems like the other thread that blaimed game freaks and totally exemped ninty on Pokémon rehashing problems. Some Nintendo fans don't accept any criticism torwards the company.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."