By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem said:
Hynad said:
 

Really? Console wars? Because people feel the faces look stiff and lifeless? Go back through the thread and see what people actually have to say about their dislikes of those faces.  Console war has nothing to do with it.

Not surprising that you come to this conclusion though. After all, you're one who acts the very same way you describe when it comes to non-Nintendo related stuff.


They dont look lifeless and stiff! They look anime! Are you unable to deal with the fact that they have a different design choice than what you want? Is it because the rest of the world looks realistic, even though its fantasy?

This is a JRPG, their faces are not supposed to be realistic! Cmon...

Thanks for the link, i know my posts are logical. My opinion doesnt change from console manufacturer to console manufacturer. 60 fps is the best thing for gaming over resolution and pretty effects. Its a game, not a movie. If you played Xenoblade chronicles you would know that very well. Their faces on that game were really pixelated textures. Didnt hear you complain about that one and its unversally considered the best JRPG of last generation.

Seriously, blame me for not beeing a graphics slave and enjoying actual gameplay.

You are so defensive. To me, they look like lifeless and stiff anime faces. Is that better formulated? Or are you unable to deal with the fact that not all people take everything from Nintendo as if it's some sort of godly milk or something that can't be criticized? Where did I say the graphics need to look like real life to have an ounce of life and character?

They look like lifeless and stiff anime dolls. That doesn't mean they have to be realistic to be otherwise. Ni No Kuni and Zelda U are both using an Anime look, and the characters faces don't look stiff or lifeless. Yet, they don't look realistic either. 

And Xenoblade on the Wii is far from perfect. It was good. Not godly.