By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Protendo said:
DonFerrari said:
Companies care less about marketshare than About total sales and profit. Of course bigger presence and MS preffers total domination but no need to fret over it.


Exactly.  It's just like how developers supported the PS3 before the turnaround.  Sure more developers will focus on the Xbox 360 to build a game on, using their B team on the PS3 ports.  Sure the 360 will get cheaper exclusives.  It's the same thing but the rolls are reversed.  Though outside of the US and UK where Playstation never lost ground and Xbox is losing more ground, Playstation will gain exclusives.


I don't think it was a real turn around as it was managed drop... Certainly Sony invested a lot to keep ps3 viable, but their growth even with the bumps seemed more like natural than forced.

 

But I agree with everything else. Perhaps some genres/budgets can see more ps exclusives than gen 7th but most of the big guns will be multiplat.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."