ICStats said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
LOL what a bizarre article. I like how he lists some common gameplay complaints, like boring and generic, but tries to tell us those complaints are invalid because of these massive reaches on what qualifies as innovative, none of which are crucial to gameplay. aka the portion of the game people are worried about.
I mean, the gunplay looks like ass, there seems to be way to many QTE's and it looks extremely linear, all imho, but the music and some development tricks! Surely those make up for it. And the setting, wow. Even though you can't explore off your set cinematic path, it's still totally innovative! Weak gunplay and tired TPS mechanics in a typical espionage setting or the usual sci-fi, well that's boring. Weak gunplay and tired mechanics in a Victorian setting, baby you got a stew going. |
For once I agree with LudicrousSpeed. The games problem is not innovation, it's the gameplay.
What the heck is with the hand pistol having ridiculous recoil spasm, while bullets seem to curve and hit the target anyway? That's some innovation that would've been better left out.
|
You and Ludicrous played it?
