DMeisterJ said:
selnor said:
DMeisterJ said:
The 50 million was a loan, not a gift for exclusive content. And the loan got them some EEC, but they wouldn't screw Sony over some money, Sony was the only system willing to give GTA III a chance, when Nintendo and MS didn't want to touch it. If you all think back, you can remember how no one wanted the game on the system beside Sony. I don't think that R* and TT would do that to the company that helped them. |
Just like to point out, If you were the head of a company and were very close to the edge finacially would you A) say no to a company to try to stay faithful to another with at the time alot less hardware? Or B) be grateful your arse was being saved and take the money for in return whatever they wanted.
|
I just find it so weird. Take-Two has no loyalty. |
hm. Is Sony loyal to gamers? With the PS3 didn't they risk their entire gaming business and the PS brand on the BluRay format? Yes. Why? Potential profit. It's business. Without M$ 50 mill loan there might not be GTA4.
At the end of the day, it's all business.
