By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ka-pi96 said:
Nate4Drake said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Why are they considered quality? Because someone else said so? Different people like different things and therefore consider different things to be of high quality. It is very much subjective.

So, following your logic, everything is opinable. So, if I say Mario 64 does not have any quality in it, I can be still right because this is my opinion, and who does care if 99% of people say Mario64 is a great game and has quality. Same for Uncharted2; if I don't like it, I might say it has not quality, who does care if it won hundreds of Awards and 99% of people say it's a quality game. If I don't like a game and I think the Game has no quality, the value of the package, acclaimed from the majority, becomes suddently subjective;  Uncharted2 won 10 Awards, like Game of the Year, Outstanding Achievement in Game Direction, Adventure Game of the Year, Outstanding Achievement in Animation, Outstanding Achievement in Visual Engineering, Outstanding Achievement in Art Direction, Outstanding Achievement in Original Music Composition, Outstanding Achievement in Game Play Engineering, Outstanding Achievement in Sound Design, 

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/gamesblog/2010/feb/19/awards-games

Isn't it quality ? who does care if it won 10 Awards, I don't like it so the Quality is opinable, right ?

Of course it's an opinion. How do you think awards are given out? Based on people's opinions of course.


I'm wasting my time.



”Every great dream begins with a dreamer. Always remember, you have within you the strength, the patience, and the passion to reach for the stars to change the world.”

Harriet Tubman.