Curious that most if not all the complaining about the OP (which is quite good) comes from Nintendo fan who criticizes most if not all that Sony does.
Would anyone say where a Mario game coreplay inovated? But it doesn't matter because the game is very good.
Also disagree with the dictionary to keep bashing the game? The point of the OP was basically dismiss the useless "not inovative" criticism that don't bring anything to discussion. As also "not being fun" since that is enterely taste oriented and subjective.
Another Point on inovation on techonological side RaD done was regarding multiple layering texturing as show in a presentation at the time they unveiled the game.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
