By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nem on 15 January 2015
Edit Thread
Wallpos said:
fluky-nintendy said:
I don't even think it's locked 30. Also it still looks rough around the edges, but also better than the last gameplay footage they showed on E3 I think.


100% agree. I noticed screen tearing too, framerate is not stable, very noticeable with far camera orbitting. Just like Shining Resonance, it's probably self suggestion. It did happen to me, i saw Shining Resonance footage on youtube, it has 60fps version, so i thought it was 60fps.. lol

If someone say it's 60fps he must be blinded by his fanboism.. 720P 30FPS MAX. "Wow supposedly weak Wii U has the best graphics out of three, it must be M$ and $ony conspiracy" ah, that classic Wii U fans justification. LMAO


Did you register to post precious gems such as this? 

Fact of the matter is that the Wii U first party titles have been more impressive than anything we saw on the more powerful hardware. Graphic design is playing a bigger role now than raw power. Its not like the noticeable difference the Wii had to the PS3 and 360. I'm afraid results outweight theory. 60 fps or not, its an impressive looking game and probably a very good one to boot. But, most if not all first party games have been at 60fps on the Wii U. No hardware will ever convince me that particle effects and volumetric whatevers are more important than 60fps gameplay. The real next-gen games are the ones improving graphics and running at 60fps.

And to anyone saying the faces look bad, lets look at the faces of the recent Dragon age inquisition. Now those are horrible faces... and i'm a fan of the series.