| V-r0cK said: I would disagree. I've always enjoyed the RE series since the first but after RE5 my world of it has changed (gameplay-wise, however setting-wise I would prefer back in the city with real zombies). Coop campaign is just an optional feature since you can still play RE5 & 6 by yourself I don't see the harm in having the option. Personally i've always thought that it'd make more sense having coop since back then for RE. Ie. When Claire and Leon met up why would they split up? In no horror scenario would anybody ever want to split up. RE5 introduced my gf into playing the series (she knew about the older ones but had no interest in them) and she loved it and is excited to play RE Revalations 2 with me. Clearly we have different definitions of what is suited and can ruin the game. Personally from my experience and those around me coop campaign made the RE series a whole lot better. |
Of course it does not make sense. It does not have to do, it has to be a good game, and the games prior to RE5 were all better, and part of the success was exactly because the horror feel of being alone. In order to be a good survival horror (not a good action game) it needs to be a single player. Co-op in a tru survival horror will take out the horror feel.
| Burek said: What do you mean? RE5 had co-op, and that is easily the best RE game ever. Coop elevated the fun to another level, being able to share the experience. And of all faults and misfires RE6 had, none of them were due to co-op. I also liked Revelations a lot, so I'm looking forward to part 2. |
Opinions and all that, RE5 is not a survival horror in the same vein as REmake.
Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever
Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe
Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor
Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile









