Chubear said:
See that's the problem; there will be more people like you in 2013 stating that the PS3 was the obvious winner and had no resistance what so ever and then use the same arguements used to discredit the PS3 on the PS4. In case you were too young to know, have/had amnesia or are just blatantly blind, the PS1&2 had their fair share of mud slung their way with the latter having even more crap thrown it's way. It's been over 7 years but you can still find all the vial crap the media said about the PS2 then somewhere around the internet. The Newyork TIMES have always tried to bust Sony's butt and were awfull to the PS2. Here's an example from an article back then. See if you see any similarities http://archive.salon.com/tech/log/2000/10/27/playstation_rant/index.html |
I didn't write that the criticism of the PS2 and PS3 were completely different. I wrote that they are not exactly the same. That link you put has a lot of differences as well as similarities.
One important difference is that the PS3 is being outsold by systems already out, not theoretically going to be outdone by systems a year later.
And again, criticism of the price was not widespread. The PS2 was mostly praised for offfering a DVD drive at no more than the price of the PS1 at its launch. The PS3 has as much criticism for its price as praise for the quality of the player.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








