By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
atomicblue on 08 January 2015
Edit Thread
eva01beserk said:
atomicblue said:
eva01beserk said:
atomicblue said:


I don't think comparing something like Ori to something like Bloodborne is delusional at all (though I wouldn't count Ori as I believe it's coming to PC as well). Ori's another one I'm looking forward to more than Bloodborne (which just doesn't look like my kind of game).

Is someone wrong for saying Ori looks like a better, more rewarding game than Bloodborne? Maybe for them it is. The fact that Bloodborne is really hyped and popular doesn't mean it's inherently better somehow; that's called a bandwagon fallacy.

Its quite ok to say its better for you than bloodbourne, But again, its not in the same league. Ori is not a gmae people buy a console for while bloodbourne is. Another word I dont like using is niche, because as niche as a game might be, some people will buy a console for them, but for ori thats not the casse, so it dosent even qualify as a niche game.

This thread(as ridiculous as I might think it is) is not about witch games are better than witch, is about games that move consoles and wich has the most.


You don't know that. There are probably people out there who would buy a console for Ori. Other 2D platformers have sold consoles - hell, New Super Mario Bros. Wii outsold almost every other game last gen - why couldn't Ori? Bloodborne might be more popular, but say it with me: popular does NOT mean better. It doesn't mean the people whose views don't match popular opinion are wrong, and for them XO's exclusives might be better.

There is no objective way to say any console has a better games lineup in 2015 because everyone's tastes are different. Saying "PS4's 2015 lineup is better than XO's" is an opinion, not a fact. If that's a more popular opinion, that still doesn't make it a fact.

You are still getting hung up on things Im not saying or that I clearly explained. And now you are comparing mario with ori? Are you serious? Im not even going to dignify that with a response.

I know popular does not mean better, I already said I dont like to use the word niche just cuz wat you said, I know COD is garbage no matter how much it sells, but ori does not qualify. I need an ps4 to play bloodbourne, I need a x1 to play halo 5 and I neeed a wii u to play zelda U, I need nothing to play ori. It dosent even have online play, that I know of, So there is no need to buy an x1 for ori since any pc can play it and any 360. So if you really want to play ori as badly as you want, you dont need any push to jump to current gen since the experience will be the same anyware else.


You just did. And you seem intent on ignoring my point that something like Ori (I'm not retarded, I believe I actually pointed out earlier that it can't really be counted because it's coming to PC) shouldn't be discounted because you see it as "niche". Something like Bloodborne doesn't make PS4's lineup better for anyone other than those people who actually want to play Bloodborne; whether it's got mass appeal is completely irrelevant since this is all about personal preference. Hell, if Nintendo announced something like a new Endless Ocean game for 2015 that would go a long way towards me saying Wii U had the best games lineup because I personally love the series.

CoD might be garbage but if either company had it as an exclusive, I'm sure there are plenty of people who would pick that console as having the better games lineup based on that, too.

And, back to my original point - if someone really likes the look of Quantum Break or Scalebound, they might say the XO has the better 2015 lineup and they wouldn't be delusional for saying so. Who's to say either or both of those games won't be better than anything PS4 puts out this year? It's all totally subjective.