eva01beserk said:
atomicblue said:
eva01beserk said:
atomicblue said:
You're contradicting yourself a bit. To say that it's all preference right after calling people delusional if they think XO has the better quality exclusives for 2015; for some people, the smaller number of exclusives on XO next year might be good enough to outweigh the larger number on PS4.
I don't particularly care for what either console's got on offer in exclusives next year (in that particular area, I think Wii U is miles ahead at the moment), but Scalebound and Quantum Break interest me personally more than any of PS4's 2015 exclusives, so based on that alone I'd obviously say XO has the better quality exclusives. There's no objective "correct" opinion on this so there's no need to call anyone delusional.
|
I did not. I said comparing numers wise the big hitters that will atract peeople is what is delusional. What I also say is delusional is that people throw in games like ori and compare them to blooodbourne. When I say quality I dont mean wich game is better, I said wich games are of quality, mainly excluding indis and games of the type. There is no questiong the ps4 has a lot more. I dint want to say AAA, because I dont think that only big AAA games can make a console atractive for gamers, But there are little games that definetly dont even get a glance at.
At the end its all preference Like I said before, and like you said, you can be atracted to the very few a console has to offer, mre then the huge amount the other has. I know for me thats the case, gime a good action rpg and I dont care if thats the only game Ill play again. And yes, wii u will rock it, the the OP dint even bother to mentione it and all of its great exclusives.
|
I don't think comparing something like Ori to something like Bloodborne is delusional at all (though I wouldn't count Ori as I believe it's coming to PC as well). Ori's another one I'm looking forward to more than Bloodborne (which just doesn't look like my kind of game).
Is someone wrong for saying Ori looks like a better, more rewarding game than Bloodborne? Maybe for them it is. The fact that Bloodborne is really hyped and popular doesn't mean it's inherently better somehow; that's called a bandwagon fallacy.
|
Its quite ok to say its better for you than bloodbourne, But again, its not in the same league. Ori is not a gmae people buy a console for while bloodbourne is. Another word I dont like using is niche, because as niche as a game might be, some people will buy a console for them, but for ori thats not the casse, so it dosent even qualify as a niche game.
This thread(as ridiculous as I might think it is) is not about witch games are better than witch, is about games that move consoles and wich has the most.
|
You don't know that. There are probably people out there who would buy a console for Ori. Other 2D platformers have sold consoles - hell, New Super Mario Bros. Wii outsold almost every other game last gen - why couldn't Ori? Bloodborne might be more popular, but say it with me: popular does NOT mean better. It doesn't mean the people whose views don't match popular opinion are wrong, and for them XO's exclusives might be better.
There is no objective way to say any console has a better games lineup in 2015 because everyone's tastes are different. Saying "PS4's 2015 lineup is better than XO's" is an opinion, not a fact. If that's a more popular opinion, that still doesn't make it a fact.
