eva01beserk said:
I did not. I said comparing numers wise the big hitters that will atract peeople is what is delusional. What I also say is delusional is that people throw in games like ori and compare them to blooodbourne. When I say quality I dont mean wich game is better, I said wich games are of quality, mainly excluding indis and games of the type. There is no questiong the ps4 has a lot more. I dint want to say AAA, because I dont think that only big AAA games can make a console atractive for gamers, But there are little games that definetly dont even get a glance at. At the end its all preference Like I said before, and like you said, you can be atracted to the very few a console has to offer, mre then the huge amount the other has. I know for me thats the case, gime a good action rpg and I dont care if thats the only game Ill play again. And yes, wii u will rock it, the the OP dint even bother to mentione it and all of its great exclusives. |
I don't think comparing something like Ori to something like Bloodborne is delusional at all (though I wouldn't count Ori as I believe it's coming to PC as well). Ori's another one I'm looking forward to more than Bloodborne (which just doesn't look like my kind of game).
Is someone wrong for saying Ori looks like a better, more rewarding game than Bloodborne? Maybe for them it is. The fact that Bloodborne is really hyped and popular doesn't mean it's inherently better somehow; that's called a bandwagon fallacy.








