By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 06 January 2015
Edit Thread
jlmurph2 said:
DonFerrari said:

Yep... compare a service with very few users and even fewer games that utilize online to massively dependant games... makes all sense in the world.


That is a great point. Whenever I hear about people playing Wii U online I only hear Smash and Mario Kart. PS4 and Xbox One have tons of games online, not just 2.

Yep. If someone says live is better than psn I wouldn't disagree (and anyone who does would be talking more about personal experience and preferences) but the services are comparable in scope (with live usually being faster and more stable), but Nintendo online isn't even in the same ballpark.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."