RubberWhistleHistle said:
if you take a look at the BIGGEST publishers in the industry, nintendo is the LEAST culpable of milking their franchises. thats the point people are trying to make. and like i said before, i halfway agree with you on pokemon. maybe 3/4 agree. its still not as bad as many others. again, nitnendo is the least guilty of this and the fact that their franchises last three decades is proof of that. |
You can hardly say Sony milks its franchise... yes they release 3-4 games of the same franchise on a gen (like ND games) or 1-2 per gen (like GT), but I fail to see any franchise you can accuse Sony of milking (the closest thing would be R&C but that is 2nd party and I'm not sure how much is Sony demanding or Insominiac asking).

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







