By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RubberWhistleHistle said:
DerNebel said:
WhiteEaglePL said:


They can have a say, but they choose not to. Gamefreak/Pokemon company is the one that doesn't want the main series to also be on home consoles.

Also, cod, fifa, ac (shame)  ect say afternoon. 

Good on battlefield for taking it's time and being great.

What does being on home consoles have to do with this? Pokemon is being extremely milked, by all parties that have a say in it, god I can't believe that people constantly try to push the blame away from Nintendo with these things.

if you take a look at the BIGGEST publishers in the industry, nintendo is the LEAST culpable of milking their franchises. thats the point people are trying to make. and like i said before, i halfway agree with you on pokemon. maybe 3/4 agree. its still not as bad as many others. again, nitnendo is the least guilty of this and the fact that their franchises last three decades is proof of that.


You can hardly say Sony milks its franchise... yes they release 3-4 games of the same franchise on a gen (like ND games) or 1-2 per gen (like GT), but I fail to see any franchise you can accuse Sony of milking (the closest thing would be R&C but that is 2nd party and I'm not sure how much is Sony demanding or Insominiac asking).



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."