generic-user-1 said:
i think thats why the women and the man with the stones before got their money back so easy, its a shady practise and they got catched doing it. |
Yep... and if they mix new merchandise with used they can't say with a straight face she changed the content, because they would have to prove they only sell new stuff and sony wouldn't send bibles in the box (or if that happened they would just demand a refund from sony as well), but as they mix if the case pushed forward they would have some trouble in court.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







