Scientology on the news again, Anonymous owned them again

[PooperScooper]

Flow said:

starcraft said:

Listen guys. Your the ones that said it was their official policy. You could have said it was their in-practice policy. You could have said it was their de facto policy. But instead, you made up some bull about murder and extortion being part of the CoS's official policy, which is exactly the kind of defamatory and unproven comments I was complaining Anonymous made.

I looked at every link you provided and repeatededly agreed with how dodgy the CoS is. But you refuse to see that, or acknowledge that I'm not arguing about the CoS's morality. For some reason you seem to be against what I consider the fundamental right of human beings to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Oh and Pooper, have you ever heard of Nuremburg? The Nazi's were actually given a trial, have the CoS got one? Or is it still just a bunch of people too gutless to show their faces running around screaming "guilty, GUILTY?"

 

  I wholeheartedly agree with the right of being presumed innocent until proven guilty, and there they are, proved guilty. That's what we are trying so long to show you.

Anonymous doesn't go around screaming "GUILTY!", they present the proof just like ssj12 did, and i bet many other anonymous are doing everywhere else.

Also i would love to see a real trial to finally leave the church alone or finish it. Probably the latter will happen. 

funny thing is innocent until proven guilty only matters in the court of law. He is treating this like a trial. when in fact it isnt. there is a certain point when repeat circumstantial incidents becomes substantial. And in fact hearsay only again matters in trial. Also this is coming from people who experience first hand. This is first hand knowledge and not hearsay.

and lets not forget starcraft was orginally saying that CoS had a right to confront their accusers when they do not.