By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Galahaddy said:
DonFerrari said:

In fact after you done your good research you could look for an interview were Kaz said growing marketshare for PS4 rapidily were the priority not the profit in the first years.

 


Which makes sense, considering the rapid growth of PS+ members and its corresponding revenue. I'm sure that they'll be willing to forget HW profit next year in favor of market share growth for the purposes of increased PS+ and SW revenue.


Yep... if X1 would be making 100 loss per console that is smart as well in the first year since those are the customers that would buy a lot more than 10 games and would generate more than 300 bucks profit per sale...

Cutting X360 or PS3 price right now only if they wanted to keep the console selling more (altough the numbers are still good) but never for loss at this late in their age... but in the first 2 years taking the loss isn't a problem, Sony have done it for 3 consoles already.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."