Skullwaker said:
That's essentially the same thing then, perhaps even worse because there's no one that has a dedicated job of regulating bottled water. Regardless though, they don't spend enough time or resources on it. At this point, bottled water is more harmful than tap water, and big businesses spend so much money trying to convince us otherwise. If you have any interest in this topic, I really advise that you watch or at least skim the documentary "FLOW: For Love of Water." It's really informative and faces the facts, dangers and possible solutions of our situation regarding water. |
Honestly, it is a way to skew people to support their cause. Ten people working for one hour each are much more efficient than one person working for ten hours. Same is true for say 20 people spending some of their time working on regulating bottled water vs. one person spending all of his/her time. 20 people have vastly more skills and knowledge than one person. Nevertheless, I do believe that there is an inconsistency here. There should be no reason why tap water is regulated so much more than bottled water, if the system is suppose to be equitable.
I'll skim the documentary you mentioned though. I don't doubt that the FDA chooses favorites here. They do it in pretty much every industry they regulate.