By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Well, I am not against remasters from the ps3/360 gen, I am just against remastering games thats 1 years old... Cause to me, one of the main points of the remaster is if you played the original and then you play the remaster, the visual difference should be different enough to make you notice it at first glance and say wow! That is quite a difference! The issue with one year old remasters is that, that is very hard to do and people really have to look into it in order to notice it! But if the game has enough of a visual difference for people to notice it at first sight in the screenshots, thats fine

But again, thats my own personal gripe with it. Yes, with a remaster, anyone that hasn't played it gets to play it but that logic goes for all remasters and the difference between a great remaster and a cheap remaster is that a great remaster rewards the players that played the original but showing them noticably improved visuals at first glance (regardless of the resolution its shown in) vs cheap remasters are there just for the new players and puts minimal effort into showing the players that have already played the game much of a visual difference



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850