Scientology on the news again, Anonymous owned them again

[PooperScooper]

starcraft said:

PooperScooper said:
Um rapist and murderers dont have the right to face their accusers like in one of these settings.

I'm assuming you mean "alleged" rapists and murderers.   If someone pleads guilty to one of these crimes then of course there is no reason for them to face their accusers.  However, everyone is entitled to a fair trial and to be presumed innocent.  It is an absolutely fundamental right of any accused to have charges properly tested before judgement is passed.

Accountability is key. 

yeah but when they get accused of rape the police arent going to go to them and be like "Barbra Streisand accused you of rape now go face your accuser"

This isnt in the confines of the court room.

Hell they so not have the right to face their accuser that the police go so far as to put people in witness protection if the accused knows who their accuser is,

HELL and if the accuser pointed the police in the right direction and the police gathered enough evidence to press charges the accuser doesnt have to testify if they dont want to. while the accused would have no clue where the tip came from (anonymous tips)

This just proves the church has no right to know who these people are and these people are well within their legal and moral rights wearing masks.