PDF said:
Hmm maybe I will reread Clash of Civilizations. I remember not being a big fan of it in school. I know I didn't like Fukyama "End of History" and it's kind of a response to that. |
Both viewpoints are wrong. Fukuyama because he didn't recognize that much of the supposed "free markets" and "liberal democracy" in the developing world after the end of the Cold War were really neither of those things. I tend to agree that modes of government will reach a singularity as time goes by, but the Post Cold War world was not the beginning of the end of history. There is still much to be written before things settle in that direction.
Huntington believes deeply that cultural differences make the western mode of government mostly untenable in areas beyond Western Europe (and even within Western Europe there are contentions, according to him, due to the Catholic/Protestant divide). I find this largely to be a load of malarkey, in that while culture has had a tremendous impact on where we are and where we're going, economics is what determines the dominant order of the day. Traditional government (monarchies/theocracies and their ilk) were swept away by modern state systems: democracy, military rule, and various one-party systems, and this was because of changing economic modes. As the world "flattens" economically, so the world shall normalize politically.

Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.







