badgenome said:
No, it doesn't. It means exactly what it says: that females will no longer be excluded from certain positions unless the Secretary of Defense decides otherwise. That is, positions they want to hold. It doesn't mean that they're elligible for the draft. Panetta himself said so: "With regards to Selective Service, you know, that’s not our operation," Panetta said. "I don’t know who the hell controls Selective Service, if you want to know the truth. But, you know, whoever does, they’re going to have to exercise some judgment based on what we just did." And from the Selective Service website:
Women Aren't Required to RegisterHere's why: THE LAW THE SUPREME COURT Panetta reckoning that, maybe, whoever the hell runs Selective Service will have to exercise some judgment based on what he just did has nothing to do with the law as it exists.
|
You really don't know how to read do you? All of that is pre-january 2013.... After january 2013 that is no longer the case. The law and the entire selective serrvice is in the process of updating and removing gender based barriers to service, which includes adding woman to the draft, as stated on january 24 2013. try reading again.. "to eliminate all unnecessary gender-based barriers to service" by definition woman not being added to the draft is a gender based barrier to service.
http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030
All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)







