DanneSandin said:
generic-user-1 said:
DanneSandin said:
1. I'm using well established phrases, so that we both understand what is being discussed here. We're not discussing whether or not it should be called "objectification" or "subjectification".
2. I've already said many times in this thread, that sexualization is more about the potrayals of (in this case) women. I don't think I've mentioned it's about fucking?
3. You didn't say anything mean about a person though, you said something mean about a whole.... class?... of people, anemly men. Generalizing a whole group of people and saying negative things about that group of people can (sometimes) be discriminating. It's like me calling every *specific religious group/nationlity* for less intelligent
|
3. it depends on how you generalize. men are stupid because of reasons that are there for every men.
and yes, some religiose groups are more stupid than others, and nationality and intelligents correlate too, intelligents isnt just a genetical thing, and some nations have better education systems than others we are just not allowed to say it.
|
Oh, by every single God out there... When I mentioned intelligence and nationality/religion I wasn't refering to the education system or anything of that sorts. I was talking about the ability to think and create that most people are born with, not how well educated they are.
|
so we can cut nationality, but why you wanna cut religion too? i cant decide if im german or polish, but i can decide if im a mormone or a scientologist... and dont forget that religios education has a negative effect on childrens intelligents...
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.12138/abstract
