DJEVOLVE said:
theprof00 said:
Jimbo1337 said:
epicurean said:
I certainly said I did NOT call you a fanboy a second time. I was told not to do that.
You wrote 7 (SEVEN!) paragraphs on how someone is led to believe they are saving $140 dollars, but really saving nothing with a $70 dollar gift card. Think about that for a moment.
I say you are basically saving $70 dollars with the purchase, as you can use that money to spend on other items.
(That's it. One sentence. It's NOT THAT COMPLICATED.)
You also completely shut down my argument initially by saying "No it doesn't depend on the customer." No, "I could see how you see it that way", or "Some people might view it like that", just a straight "nope, you're wrong." You started all this, not me. |
First, you really really need to calm down. Second, you asked me to explain how I got to $140 so I did. My apologizes that it took me seven paragraphs for me to explain the scenario when in the end, you still didn't understand it. I guess I should have written a novel for you next time.
Second, I never once told you that you are wrong. I even said that you got part of it correct in my long winded (SEVEN!!) paragraph post. Me saying "well you got part of correct" means "nope, you're wrong" in your eyes. Got it...
Well then let me rephrase:
It does depend on the consumer. Those that get tricked by the retailer and those who don't. Better?
|
This is ridiculous. Why do stores have sales at all if not to get you in the building and buying other things? Am I to believe that cigarettes actually cost me 15 dollars because the retailer makes me buy additional goods. That is insane.
In fact, the whole premise is ridiculous. I don't know where you came up with it. It's a bundle with 3 free games and 70$ worth of anything else you want from the store. You can even give the giftcard as a present. It's value on top of value. Slow it down.
|
So exactly what was your arguement? LOL
|
Waste of a post, DJ. Pay more attention in class and you will succeed. D+
