By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SvennoJ said:
DonFerrari said:
People who really played the game = the game is a lot better than what the score tells.

People that didn't play, saw reviews or played few minutes = the game is mediocre and deserves the low score.

Which to believe? Choices to make.

There are always people that don't like racing on tracks, just like to mess around in a big world. It's no different from people saying linear games are mediocre by default. There are still people claiming TloU is mediocre, personal preference.

I enjoy both and will get FH2 with my eventual XBox One purchase. Just not too soon after I've finally had enough of DC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9hUgxN--Tk
Apart from it not looking as great, the roads are also a lot wider, removing a lot of skill, and you don't even have to stay on them. They seem wider than in Forza Horizon too, maybe it's just the camera angles. Anyway that's my personal preference. Other people enjoy cutting corners through fields. I'll be sticking to the roads when I play FH2 and curse at the cheating drivatars, then overtake them again :)

I uploaded two more videos
Kinloch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2j4zrsGEZjg

Skjolden (where I went flying before)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkTJ6NxyUK8

Youtube keeps asking if I would like to stabalise my videos lol.
I'm currently rediscovering all the tracks in India with weather. Very different experience in the wet. A night run in heavy rain there is about as difficult as the heavy snow run in Norway. Perhaps more difficult, I could not beat the AI at semi-pro level, and had to turn the rain down to dynamic to make up some time in sections where the rain lets off a bit.

India with cloudy weather and dynamic rain has you driving in the clouds in places. Looks like thick fog patches blowing over the road in front of you adding another level of sensory overload. In a multi lap race, what you could see the first lap might be gone the next.


I would say there are always people that will complain and bash games unecessarily. But well, that happens.

I like linear games and track based... I abhor sand box, feel to empty and boring to me, but some people like it, I understand that. I just don't understand why some people want all games to be open-world... some even blaspheme asking for an open world GT. Too moronic for me. I don't ask GTA to be linear, I just don't play it and don't comment on the game at all. Not interested in it, so I won't take points for it not being the game I like to play.

I finished my gameplay on it for the moment, enjoying Kingdom Hearts Remix =] will get back to it eventually.

When will you try legendary with rain, night sweeden race with hyper car?

ohalama said:
DonFerrari said:
People who really played the game = the game is a lot better than what the score tells.

People that didn't play, saw reviews or played few minutes = the game is mediocre and deserves the low score.

Which to believe? Choices to make.


either both, or non of them

otherwise ur opinion is not less biased than the one of this both groups
it's not unusual, that some1 who played a game a long time likes it. why would u play it if u don't like it?
and it's not unusual either, that some1 who dislike a game, for whatever reason, did not even play it, or at least did not play it a long time

I said it isn't biased??? Just see no sense in valuing opinion/scores of people that haven't played the game enough to even talk about it.... you see that two guys that complained a lot about the game now are valuing it a lot more after playing some more.

Give me what value someone should give about my opinion over Halo or Gears if all I have done on those games where watching my friends play (they adored it) but found it boring??? I would never bitch about a game I have no interest... I know how to recognize a good game that I don't like much, so either I recognize it's good, but not my taste or don't talk about it. I don't like to bash games in general, the game I don't like may be the game someone loves. And I give more value to opinion of someone that likes a games and why he likes and how the promotes it (because I can see if it would interest me) than to hear bitching from people that don't like it and most of times have invested too little time to really gives me enough talking points to choose or not the game.

And are you an alt?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."