By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
uran10 said:
False advertising is still false advertising. Its not constantly 1080p so he has the right to sue. I see no problem (except sony having financial issues)


Except it is 1080p, and that should've been Sony's argument. 

  1. 1080p (also known as Full HD or FHD and BT.709) is a set of HDTV high-definition video modes characterized by 1080 horizontal lines of vertical resolution and progressive scan, as opposed to interlaced, as is the case with the 1080i display standard.

That is what sony will say in court but you forget to say that full HD or 1080p also refer to this definition: "Any display device that advertises 1080p typically refers to the ability to accept 1080p signals in native resolution format, which means there are a true 1920 pixels in width and 1080 pixels in height, and the display is not over-scanning, under-scanning, or reinterpreting the signal to a lower resolution." that is why saying 1080p is misleading as most people will refer to the common mostly known native definition of the 1080p mention on a product. If its not native they should say so, not that hard to do by the way...