shogunknight said:
Samus Aran said:
outlawauron said:
Samus Aran said:
outlawauron said:
What a terribel comparison. Both Bayonetta 1 and 2 were financial failures. The pure numbers sold aren't as important. But I do hope you continue in af ew months when LBP3 is still chugging along well past 1 million.
|
Because you know how much it cost to make Bayonetta 2?
LBP3 is a major fail compared to the sales of its predecessors.
|
We know Bayonetta 1 was a financial failure. We know Bayonetta 2 cost more than Bayonetta. Phew, that was some investigation.
And LBP has never done huge numbers FW. It just consistently sells for years. LBP1 and 2's FW are not far ahead of LBP3's FW. As for its third week, it's way ahead of LBP1 and only 80k behind LBP2. Hardly a major fail.
|
Where are your sources? The game looks extremely cheap to me. Can't have costed much. Nintendo never spends huge budgets on games.
I doubt LBP3 will ever reach even half the sales of the first LBP. The game also had very disappointing reviews, that will impact sales.
|
Bayonetta wasnt cheap.
*If it was cheap, SEGA would have easily financed a sequel
* Nintendo was in need of a mature title so they funded the sequel to the game, not only that but they made it exclusive to the platform. Financing and keeping the IP exclusive isnt cheap.
* LBP3 is at about 500k sold in its 1st month, i dont know how that doesnt look good. Its not like LBP budget is similar to Destiny or GTAV
|
You're talking about the company that financed Sonic Boom. Sega know nothing of business or developing good games. Use a better example.
This game was definitely cheap. Short campaign, poor graphics and have you even seen the cutscenes? It screams budget title to me.
