Wii U beaten by the Dreamcast - what now?

[Rogerioandrade]

reggin_bolas said:

tbone51 said:

reggin_bolas said:

What the fuck lol?

I didn't get the rebuttal. I enjoy games that have intelligent plots, complex and nuanced characters, I don't necessarily care about the violence. Mario has none of those for example.

Games like Mass Effect, Bioshock, Fallout, Last of Us (though it was overrated) suit my pallet more and those games will never make it on a Nintendo platform.

"I enjoy games that have intelligent plots, complex and nuanced characters, I don't necessarily care about the violence. Mario has none of those for example."

Because you named Mario as an example, i cant take this seriously -_-  (Really Mario?)

 

Sure because what else do you have? Zelda has a simple plot and monotone characters. Metroid is kinda cool so I'll give you that. But what's left in their repository? Kirby, Donkey Kong, F-Zero, Star Fox, Animal Crossing, Pokemon, Kid Icarus, among others. All those are very simple games, none I would label though-provoking or emotionally powerful.

You don't have much left except for maybe Fatal Frame. Nintendo is simply not a publisher for people who enjoy mature games.

 

I disagree. Zelda series, Fire Emblem series,  Fatal Frame, Earthbound, Pokemon, Kid Icarus, Xenoblade etc. have extensive plots full of characters crafted with very particular or complex personalities. Fire Emblem Awakening, Skyward Sword, Majora´s Mask, Pokemon Black/White, Xenoblade Chronicles, among others, are full of emotive moments and  certain points evoke even moral matters. It´s all in its story and gameplay elements, not  only in its graphics.

It´s all in the way you want to see things. It seems that you prefer games with movie-like cinematics rather than intriguing stories. Good stories can be told even with no graphics at all (Virtue´s Last Rewards, Hotel Dusk, Ace Attorney etc. etc. etc.)