| JazzB1987 said: Sony itself does not know why its selling so many consoles so how exactly can Sony "get its shit together" when their console is worse compared to their last console? PS3 was more powerful for its time had free online etc. |
No, Sony made too many mistakes on the ps3, the Cell was a very powerfull CPU but the ps3 still had a crappy GPU and split memory, the amount of memory available to a game was very small, there is like 80MB out of the 256MB reserved of the XMB only, is terrible, the PS4 is the complete opposite of that, a lot of shared memory, a good GPU, a not so good CPU and GDDR5.
Kutaragi introduced the PS3 with much arrogance, while mark cerny has been very humble and so has been yoshida and the rest, also there was no real online platform from sony when the ps3 launched, but now for the PS4 the PSN and PSN+ are great services that can compete with XBL. The ps4 was created with developers in mind to make developing games easy, while the ps3 was created to sell royalties by introducing/forcing blu-ray and cell, from which the second failed completely to be adopted, and was very hard to develop for and sony is development tools come out very late.
The ps3 had no good games for the first 2 years and no third party was willing to spend extra to make game look better on the cell, which was harder to program, so many multiplats looked worst on the ps3.
Since the reveal of the ps4 sony has shown it regrets everything it did leading to the launch of the ps3 and had done the opposite, so they did plan everything correctly, what they dont understand is how come they currently have the best selling console in sony's history, when there is so much competition and not that many games.
dd if = /dev/brain | tail -f | grep games | nc -lnvvp 80
Hey Listen!
