Brilliant game journalism

[Wright]

arcaneguyver said:

Wright said:

Then you acknowledge this dude is trying to fix his past errors. Unlike what OP is trying to prove, this isn't bad journalism. Not good, but not bad either.

An earmest attempt at fixing past errors in this regard would involve adjusting the review with the addendum "once the online is fixed, I will readjust this review accordingly." Unfortunately reviews seem to be written in 'fire and forget' mode, despite the internet making them easily searchable years down the road for future buyers.

There's no need to add any addendum. Some webpages update done reviews; others, don't. The same journalist that fucked up is acknowleding the problem by calling The Master Chief Collection "unaceptable" a month after his review.