By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
starcraft said:
SpartanFX said:
windbane said:
starcraft said:
 

starcraft is not gonna read this ,I m sure .He is gonna repeat the same false argument in every other thread(Starcraft here is another example of false info about bluray on your part)

I am personally done arguing with some one who's incapable of learning for now

@Moneybag

couldn't you program the AI better? XD


Actually most use of the HDD isn't provided as an option, but is mandated.  Regardless of the theoretical capabilities of both machines, what has been found is that devs are more efficiently able to use DVD9, not Blu-Ray.  This may change of course, but as yet, the Blu-Ray drive's read speed is a limitation, not part of an asset.

SpartanFX: You were right, he completely ignores that he's wrong. I don't care if installs are mandatory because they decrease load times. I know some people want that option and that's fine, but it's still faster and only a option for all PS3 owners. But again, DL DVDs on 360 have slower read speeds than the entire blu-ray disc! Stop ignoring that! If developers can efficiently use read speeds that change across a disc but are always slower than blu-ray, I think they can handle the uniform faster read speeds on a blu-ray disc. Your only reference for this redundant data being used is probably Oblivion. But guess what? THE LOAD TIMES WERE HALF AS LONG AS THE 360 VERSION. Stop trolling.