Digital Foundry vs Captain Toad

[DonFerrari]

Samus Aran said:

Uabit said:

Samus Aran said:

Because we al know how fun a game like Ryse or Battlefield 4 are! 

That's a matter of tastes. I wouldn't touch Captain Toad even with a stick. 

At least Captain Toad was glitch/bug free when it launched. Ryse is barely playable as is and I heard a lot of bad things about BF4. This is what people mean with "Wii U can do 60fps while PS4/XBOXONE can't". Nobody in his right mind is implying that the Wii U is a stronger console. It's that Nintendo has a different philosophy than the rest of the gaming industry. No surprise that Nintendo is the oldest still active game developer (that is of any relevance, so don't bother coming of with obscure examples). 

Obviously I want better graphics as well, but not at the cost of my gameplay experience. 

I'm pretty sure Atari is older, still relevant and releasing game... Sierra is back as well...

But if you want to say console maker, sony and MS can't go back in time to release earlier and Sega failed more because of other reasons, not because of glitches.

There is no need to parade on high horses. But why are people still talking about things not related to Captain Toad and if it is worth a play or not?