By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RubberWhistleHistle said:
DonFerrari said:
RubberWhistleHistle said:


the wii u actually has worthwhile games that arent broken and dont require insane updates and installs. no wii u games that im aware of forces you to buy dlc to simply complete your game. also, every game that offers online on wii u actually works, and you dont even have to pay for it. last but not least, the big heavy hitters for ps4/x1 have been considered huge disappointments by many.. as far as i know, every nintendo game has delivered and a lot of times, exceeded expectations of critics.

i understand if youre not into the games on the wii u to begin with.. but you should have known that going into purchasing one. if the games do interest you, i dont see how you can put up with all this garbage that is going on with these other games on the ps4/x1 and be disappointed with the wii u. i cant for the life of me understand it. its the only gaming console that sticks to what made gaming so great and as big as it is. i would call it the only true gaming console of this generation.


I don't think I remember any 1st party on Sony games you have to buy a DLC to end the history... maybe you will have some extra stories launched later. But they can release a DLC a year later or a sequel... one is cheaper to buy and make.


the thing that really got me is when they included the extra content in the infamous second son collectors edition. content that should have been in the original game. the point i was kind of making is that nintendo's philosophy is entirely different, and i dont see them keeping game content from people just so they buy the more expensive version. its kind of messed up.


You are talking about the free DLC "paper trail" for everyone that have a PSN account? Or the Cole's Legacy that in US was pre-order bonus or special edition elsewhere??? I like the first thing but don't condone with the second one... but if you haven't told me about it I wouldn't even know because I didn't miss anything in the story presented in the game... But yeah they could have made it different, altough you can pay 5 bucks to have it now... but I'm not in favour of day one DLC and the thing if it impacts the story.

About bang per buck... I would say Nintendo is the worst offender on this because they keep selling the game for full price 3y after the release, while others will have the game cheaper 6 months to 1year after... and Halo MCC + the Sony HD Collections usually have more than 3 games on it for 2/3 the price of a new game, so they also have quite good deals. Maybe the games just don't attract you.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."