Richard Leadbetter is one of the most pró-MS and anti-SONY guys in the media since ps3 at least. Never lost a opportunity to bash Sony on mistakes and downplay on succes while doing the opposite for MS.
The only sites I can think are more like this would be Polygon and then a little less Kotaku and IGN.
Quite funny that everyone agreeing with the type of review they have been doing against sony and in favour of other platforms are the anti-sony crowd.
I would never review a game on a genre or direction I don't appreciate because my opinion wouldn't be an indicative of the true value of a game. If I had to review Halo objectively I would give 8-9, if based on how much I liked it then just 3-4, and I'm certain the first one is a lot closer to what the game deserves. Although I could defend I have my right to opinion and to bash it I wouldn't. So why would a professional be allowed this kind of BS?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
