By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Carl2291 said:
Ka-pi96 said:
Pure cost doesn't represent value though. That could easily have been just a large amount of poor games (I think it has been recently actually).


Are you really gonna argue that $50 for over $1,300 worth of content ranging at 79/78 Meta isnt a good deal?

How can you really argue that it is just a large amount of poor games too, when the average Meta's range from 79/78?

 

LOL what? You can turn ANYTHING into a negative argument.  The rational mind sees 1300>50 and can mathematically derive the value exists.  Others will need to qualify via Meta Critic lol