I do agree with you. A score must show the reality of the game not what it was when the review was done.
If reviewer didn't noticed several problems he should take points after release. Or if consistent improvement is made grade should improve.
And people are funny. If dev delay a game they curse, if they need patch they curse... I bet everyone here always meet all deadlines and never makes a mistake, such brilliant folks.
Let's bash devs for rushing or delaying but accept reviewers do 30min reviews just for hits, missing features, problems and etc.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
