By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Twilord said:
st0pnsw0p said:

So what you're saying is, the more colorful/less realistic something is, the more artistic it is? I guess someone needs to go back in time and tell Leonardo Davinci that the Mona Lisa has a worse artstyle than Phineas and Ferb.

Pfft? Mona Lisa isn't realistic. Have you never studied the dimensional qualities of the background he used to make it pop?

Never said it was realistic, just comparatively more realistic, which (along with being less colorful) is what the losers in your pic all have in common.

Game_God said:

There is nothing aratistic in copying reality, taking a picture of reality does not require art skills, inventing a imaginary world does!

Just taking a photo isn't very artistic, no, and neither is just making an imaginary world. I could draw a bunch of stick figures, say they live in the mystical Gorbenland, add a few unicorns and dragons and that would be an imaginary world, but it's no more art than if I took a photo of my cat making a funny face. Taking a good photo, just like making a unique and fleshed-out world, takes talent.