Wii Vs PS3/XBOX360 [Technicaly]

[LordTheNightKnight]

FJ-Warez said:

LordTheNightKnight said:
24 bit, 8 bit, and 4 bit refer to color depth. It's comparable to pics of identical resolution, say 400x300, but one pic is a bitmap, one is a jpeg, and one is a gif. The GC can run the pic as a jpeg, so all details would still be there, but with some artifacts (and they do show up in the GC version, just rarely). Since the PS2 can only run bitmaps and gifs (or pngs), it would either have to drop the resolution of a bitmap just to keep the color depth, or stick with a lower color gif, which would still be the same resolution.

Thus the color is lower, but the resolution is the same. You can see that in some of the comparison pics if you look close enough.

I'm not disputing the polygon count, so that's irrelevant.

And I'm not disputing the framerate drops in the PS2 version. Yet it can happen in the GC version, just with 12 or more enemies instead of eight to ten.

Do you want a stable framerate, just don´t drop a granade to a bunch of ganados :P

Sorry for the poly count, but I didn´t wanted to cut it...

And, about the texts, so, what happen, did the reviewers took the lost of detail like lower res textures???Because the damn floor lack of some details

Again, you have to play both versions yourself. Go around looking at everything you can, or safely can, with any weapon with a zoom. The textures have the same resolution. It may not be clear to you from those pics, but then you have to see in the game yourself.